Don't ignore Lifecycle Funds: MercerBY BEN COLLINS | TUESDAY, 13 NOV 2012 11:50AMThe benefits of Lifecycle Funds are not understood in the superannuation sector, and they should be considered as a default option under MySuper, said Mercer. |
Editor's Choice
Janus Henderson acquires NBK Wealth, Tabula Investment Management
Janus Henderson has acquired the wealth management arm of the National Bank of Kuwait, NBK Wealth, as well as European ETF provider, Tabula Investment Management.
ART names advice and education leads
Australian Retirement Trust (ART) has revamped its advice, guidance and education team and created two new leadership roles.
Men, women in same occupation drive pay gap
A whopping 80% of the gender pay gap can be attributed to women being paid less than men within the same occupation, a new economic analysis shows.
Macquarie Group profits falls 32% to $3.52bn
Macquarie Group has reported a net profit of $3.52 billion for the year ending 31 March 2024, a 32% decrease from the previous year.
Products
Expert Feed
Why advisers should consider offering general insurance to HNW clients
I have read many articles over the years about servicing high-net-worth (HNW) clients in the financial services industry.
The role of AI in financial planning: Insights from the US
Ever since ChatGPT burst onto the scene late last year, generative AI has been front and centre of business discussions and financial planning, just like ...
Considerations when nominating a charity for your super upon death
There has been a lot of talk lately about the upcoming great wealth transfer, and you might be wondering where charities fit into all this.
The end of free money
With institutional investors prudently reassessing their risks in current market conditions and seeking safe havens in alternatives such as secured private ...
Featured Profile
Robert De Dominicis
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
GBST HOLDINGS LIMITED
It was during a family sojourn to the seaside town of Pescara, Italy, Rob DeDominicis first laid eyes on what would become the harbinger of his future. Andrew McKean writes.
The "proven history" around the world should include the experience in the U.S. in 2008. The most conservative TDFs - those for individuals with an imminent retirement - lost between 9% and 41%. A Joint Congressional Hearing was held by the DOL and SEC to canvass the reasons for this failure in risk management. It turns out "nothing goes up in a falling market except for correlation". Diversification doesn't insulate against losses. Any adoption of TDFs should consider this, especially if we systematically rotate investors out of equities and into fixed income, at a point where yields are at intergenerational lows.
The thought of being moved into conservative assets just because I have ticked over age 65 seems irrational. With potentially 30 years ahead of me in retirement, where am I getting growth from to support my income needs? Hard to believe no one has 'come up and challenged him'.
Our members experience has been most positive in running an age based lifecycle default for the last 8 years and over a full economic cycle. This includes a loss of only 4% over the GFC for over 65's compared to the median Balanced loss of - 18% which was inflicted on most retirees. Whilst modeling of increased risk later in life may suggest higher investment returns the key is in matching member volatility tolerance with an acceptable level of investment risk. The end result is happy members with good consistent returns over the full economic cycle. Lifecycle investing works!